What might a copyright owner seek to prevent further infringement after a violation?

What might a copyright owner seek to prevent further infringement after a violation?

• A. Restitution of profits made by the infringer
• B. Injunction or order from the court
• C. Public announcement of the infringement
• D. Positive reviews from users

Answer: (B)

A copyright owner may pursue an injunction or order from the court as a primary legal remedy to prevent further infringement after a violation. An injunction is a court order that requires the infringer to stop their infringing activities immediately. This legal action is important because it directly addresses the ongoing nature of the infringement, aiming to halt any further unauthorized use of the copyrighted work. By securing an injunction, the copyright owner can ensure that their rights are protected and that no additional harm is done to their intellectual property. Restitution of profits made by the infringer, while a potential remedy, primarily involves monetary compensation for past infringements rather than a preventive measure for ongoing violations. A public announcement of the infringement does not stop further infringement; instead, it merely informs the public of the wrongdoing without offering any legal recourse to halt it. Similarly, obtaining positive reviews from users does not serve to address the legal infringement or prevent future occurrences. Therefore, the most effective and direct means to stop further copyright infringement is through judicial intervention via an injunction.

A copyright owner may pursue an injunction or order from the court as a primary legal remedy to prevent further infringement after a violation. An injunction is a court order that requires the infringer to stop their infringing activities immediately. This legal action is important because it directly addresses the ongoing nature of the infringement, aiming to halt any further unauthorized use of the copyrighted work. By securing an injunction, the copyright owner can ensure that their rights are protected and that no additional harm is done to their intellectual property.

Restitution of profits made by the infringer, while a potential remedy, primarily involves monetary compensation for past infringements rather than a preventive measure for ongoing violations. A public announcement of the infringement does not stop further infringement; instead, it merely informs the public of the wrongdoing without offering any legal recourse to halt it. Similarly, obtaining positive reviews from users does not serve to address the legal infringement or prevent future occurrences. Therefore, the most effective and direct means to stop further copyright infringement is through judicial intervention via an injunction.